Journal: Cell reports
Article Title: Paracrine inhibition via G protein inwardly rectifying potassium channels regulates glucagon secretion from human pancreatic alpha cells
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117068
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Perifusion experiments of dynamic glucagon secretion showing responses to step decreases in glucose concentration. Data plotted as fold change over baseline release at 5 mM (5G; n = 5–10 nondiabetic donors). (B) Quantification of glucagon responses shown in (A) (area under the curve [AUC], min 40–96). (C) Glucagon secretion in response to prolonged low glucose showing a gradual decline. Data plotted as fold change over baseline (5G; n = 13 nondiabetic donors). For comparison, changes in glucagon secretion elicited by sequential glucose steps from 11G to 7G and 7G to 1G are shown (gray). (D) Quantification of glucagon secretion shown in (C) at 0, 60, and 90 min in low glucose (1G; plotted as percentage of peak response). (E) Glucagon secretion in response to specific stimulation with epinephrine (Epi; 10 μM) ± forskolin (Fsk,1 μM) in low glucose (1G) for 90 min, followed by membrane depolarization with KCl (30 mM). Data plotted as fold change over baseline (5G) from a representative nondiabetic donor. (F) Quantification of glucagon secretion shown in (E) as AUC (minutes 124–154, n = 4–8 nondiabetic donors). (G) Glucagon secretion in response to opening K ATP channels with diazoxide (1 or 100 μM; DZ 1 or DZ 100) after prolonged exposure to low glucose (1G, 120 min). Data plotted as fold change over baseline (5G; n = 7 nondiabetic donors). (H) Quantification of glucagon secretion shown in (G) in response to diazoxide (AUC, min 132–156). (I and J) Glucagon and insulin secretion during dynamic perifusion in response to a reset period of 5, 15, or 30 min in high glucose (17G). Data normalized to minimum (at 17G) and maximum (at 1G) responses (%, average responses do not reach 100% because peaks do not synchronize; n = 5 nondiabetic donors). (K) Quantification of peak glucagon response after reset period shown in (I) and (J). Data are presented as mean ± SEM throughout the paper; * p < 0.05, ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons in (F), (H), and (K) and one-sample t test to compare the mean to 0 (B).
Article Snippet: To assess glucose-stimulated hormone release of human pancreatic islets, 120–150 human islets were placed in perifusion columns (Biorep Technologies, Cat# PERI-CHAMBER) and connected to an automated perifusion system.
Techniques: Concentration Assay, Comparison, Membrane